The reality of vote buying
The main reason behind this reversal is the Japanese government's
determined, and expensive, vote buying program. Japan has one of
the world's largest economies (third globally by purchasing power), and
it is no secret Japan leverages foreign aid for political gain.
As reported recently in the
Taipei Times:
Earlier this year it [Japan] pledged
more than US$1 million to the Pacific island of Tuvalu, a pro-whaling
IWC member, and has reached similar deals with Nauru and Kiribati and
other desperately poor countries in the Pacific. Last week it is
believed to have offered a large aid package to other Pacific
countries. It has also invited the heads of state of seven African
countries and eight Caribbean and Central American countries to visit
Tokyo in the last year. All are expected to vote with Japan at St Kitts.
At least US$300 million was given last year to Antigua, Dominica,
Grenada, Panama, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, and St Kitts
and Nevis.
(Friday, Jun 02, 2006)
Japan's whalers are so certain their control of the IWC is assured,
last whaling season they increased their self allotted Antarctic quota
to a maximum of 945 whales - including 10 endangered fin whales (second
in size only to blue whales).
In the 2007/8 it goes higher as they up the number of fin to 50, and
add another 50 endangered humpbacks on top of that. The whalers
already catch so many whales there isn't room on their factory ship for
all the meat, and a refrigerated cargo ship is sent to the Antarctic to
take boxes of whale meat back to Japan. Even still, they dump
tons of whale overboard - taking home only the more profitable
cuts. After all, why not? Who is there to tell them
otherwise? Up till now, the IWC has regularly condemned Japan's
so called "scientific" whaling, but with the whaler's in control it
will more likely pat them on the back.
Governments stand up to whaling
Some of the governments that helped enact the Southern Ocean Whale
Sanctuary (1994) and moratorium on commercial whaling (1986) have, in
fact, tried to protect these gains. This past year 17 nations
(including Brazil, Australia and the UK) issued a strongly worded
diplomatic demarche pointing out:
"Japan is now killing more whales in
the Antarctic every year than it killed for scientific research in the
31 years prior to the introduction of the moratorium on commercial
whaling."
The governments further expressed "grave concerns" that the ongoing
hunt, "will undermine the long-term viability," of both fin and
humpback whales.
But it looks like this strong diplomatic action, and ministerial level
visits to some new IWC members, will not be enough to keep Japan from
taking over. The reality is that the Japanese government has
chosen to spend more money and political capital on whaling than
governments in favour of protecting the whales. There is on some
levels probably a disbelief that the whalers can win back control of
the IWC - intuitively it just doesn't make sense considering the mess
they made of it before sanity prevailed in the early eighties.
But for years now the warning signs have been clear. No matter
what happens at this year's meeting, it should be a wake up call for
the conservation minded governments of the world.
So who is there left to stop whaling?
Mostly the people reading these words. From here on it's largely
down to us. And around the world individuals are banding together
in common cause to defend the whales. During the last whaling
season we took on Nissui - one of the world's largest seafood companies
and also a one-third shareholder in Kyodo Senpaku, which owns and
operates the whaling fleet.
Across the planet, Nissui subsidiaries heard from angry shoppers.
Organizations like the Humane Society and Environmental Investigations
Agency joined in. Greenpeace Ocean Defenders sent a total of 100,000
emails to Nissui-related companies. And Nissui lost seafood supply
contracts in Argentina after Ocean Defenders placed stickers denouncing
whaling on Nissui products in supermarkets and sent more than 20,000
emails.
Before the whaling season was over, Nissui had decided to get out of
the whaling industry because, as reported in the Nikkan Kugyo Shimbun
(Daily Industry):
"Overseas subsidiaries are having big
problems. As our business has globalized, whaling has become a hidden
risk", said Mr. Naoya Itagaki, the president of Nissui which takes the
brunt of the criticisms against its involvement in whaling because of
their share holding position in Kyodo-Senpaku.
(June 8th 2006, morning edition, Greenpeace translation)
In reality, Nissui's move was simply good business sense. Aside
from international pressure, demand for whale meat has plummeted, even
in Japan. Stockpiles of whale meat there have nearly doubled over
the last decade to 5,000 tonnes. There's so much unwanted whale
meat that it's being sold as doggie treats, and an expanded school
lunch program is in the works - with the hope of getting Japanese kids
used to eating it. The whaling industry in Norway is experiencing
similar difficulties.
Would Japan's take over of the International Whaling Commission be a
disastrous setback for the whales? Yes. But would it be the
end of the story? We will see about that.
For updates from our delegates in St Kitts see the
Defending Our Oceans political blog.