Skip navigation.

United Nations, New York, United States — Negotiations at the UN to adopt a possible moratorium on high-seas bottom trawling were torpedoed today, as a small number of influential fishing nations led by Iceland put the interests of their fishing fleets above other countries, the consensus of the marine scientific community and conservationists.

”The final agreement has more loopholes in it than a fisherman's sweater,” said Karen Sack, Greenpeace International Oceans Policy Advisor who has been monitoring the negotiations at the UN, "it does nothing to significantly change the way our oceans are managed."

"The international community should be outraged that Iceland could almost singlehandedly sink deep-sea protection and the food security of future generations, scuttling hopes for what could have been a much needed sea change in international oceans policy.” They should be embarrassed as should all those states that did not stand up to them and fight for the future of the oceans,” continues Sack.

While countries such as Australia; New Zealand; the Pacific Island States; the
United States; Brazil; India; South Africa; Chile, Germany, and even the European Community and Canada supported strong action at the UN, their drive to win consensus at all costs has resulted in a terribly weak outcome at a critical juncture.

New scientific evidence shows that by 2048, most commercial fisheries are likely to have collapsed (1). In addition, new economic data indicates that the
high-seas bottom trawl fleet would operate at a loss without the substantial
subsidies it receives (2).

”What the few countries opposed to a UN moratorium on high seas bottom trawling must realize is that for the sake of the future of their own industries, this cannot continue. The oceans are not a bottomless resource to be exploited the way they currently are. Neither is the majority of the global community interested in watching the depletion of our oceans by large unregulated fishing fleets. Radical change is needed to protect ocean life. Those countries which  made commitments to support the moratorium will now have to forge ahead and act  on their concerns by developing concrete measures to ensure clean and healthy  oceans for the future” said Sack.

Countries that committed to supporting a moratorium now have the opportunity to protect vulnerable habitats from destructive fishing and by tightening market access to bottom-trawled fish and pressing for the establishment of a global network of marine reserves across the world's oceans. The UN Fisheries Resolution is due to be adopted by the General Assembly on December 7th.





Related news stories

Notes to Editor

NOTES:
(1) Worm et al. 2006. Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services.
Science vol. 314. 3 November 2006
(2) Assoc. Prof. Rashid Sumalia, lead author of the study Catching More Bait: A
Bottom-up Re-estimation of Global Fisheries Subsidies (available at
http://www.fisheries.ubc.ca/publications/reports/14-6.pdf, see Chapter 3.)

Further contact information for reporters to get video, photos or report details

Contacts: Karen Sack in New York , +1202 4155403 Sari Tolvanen in Amsterdam +31655125480 Greenpeace MY Esperanza team: Isabel Leal, Media Officer, Greenpeace International Communications, 011 47 514 07 987 Pictures and video available from GPI Photos: John Novis, Picture Editor, Greenpeace International, +31 (20) 718 2058; Mobile +31 (0) 653 81 91 21 Video: Maarten van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, Video Producer, Greenpeace International, +31 6 4619 7322